Christian Volckman - Renaissance (2006)
Thursday, April 26, 2007
In the labyrinthine streets of 21st century Paris, where every move is monitored and ever action recorded, a mysterious kidnapping sets into motion a catastrophic series of events that could ultimately prove the downfall of civilization. The year is 2054, and the Avalon Corporation has securely woven its way into every aspect of modern living by making youth and beauty the most valued commodity around. Troubles arises in the City of Lights when a high-profile scientist named Ilona (voice of Romola Garai) is kidnapped, and policeman Barthélémy Karas (voice of Daniel Craig) is assigned the task of solving the case. As his investigation leads Karas down a menacing path where death lurks around every bend, he soon discovers that events that took place in 2006 have cast a dark shadow over the future of humankind. A film that mixes Blade Runner aesthetics with stark, Sin City-style visuals, Renaissance was filmed using motion-capture animation and features extravagant production design by Alfred Frazzani (Immortel Ad Vitam). AMG
Share Renaissance via demonoid/karagarga!
at 9:26 PM
Harun Farocki - Die Worte Des Vorsitzenden [The Words of The Chairman] (1967)
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
I was on a ship - this sounds like a novel: I had just embarked for Venezuela on June 2, 1967 as the Shah of Iran was arriving in West Berlin. There were protests, a student was shot, and a new form of opposition movement came into existence. The idea for this film came to me while I was still aboard the ship. The film is structured like acommercial. The film takes a metaphor literally: words can become weapons. However, it also shows that these weapons are made of paper. The weapon spoiled everything for the Shah and his wife, theyare wearing paper bags on their heads with faces drawn on them - the kind of bags worn by Iranian students during demonstrations to hide their identity from the Savak, the Iranian Secret Service. When I showed this film to the audiences in the late Sixties, it was highly praised. I think people understood then that over obviousness is also a form of irony. This capacity was lost a few years later. I think it's coming back today.
Harun Farocki
Share this via karagarga or demonoid!
at 11:35 AM
Harun Farocki - Videogramme einer Revolution AKA Videograms of a Revolution (1992)
In Europe in the fall of 1989, history took place before our very eyes. Farocki and Ujica's "Videograms" shows the Rumanian revolution of December 1989 in Bucharest in a new media-based form of historiography. Demonstrators occupied the television station [in Bucharest] and broadcast continuously for 120 hours, thereby establishing the television studio as a new historical site. Between December 21, 1989 (the day of Ceaucescu's last speech) and December 26, 1989 (the first televised summary of his trial), the cameras recorded events at the most important locations in Bucharest, almost without exception. The determining medium of an era has always marked history, quite unambiguously so in that of modern Europe. It was influenced by theater, from Shakespeare to Schiller, and later on by literature, until Tolstoy. As we know, the 20th century is filmic. But only the videocamera, with its heightened possibilities in terms of recording time and mobility, can bring the process of filming history to completion. Provided, of course, that there is history. (Andrei Ujica) Harun Farocki conceived of and assembled Videograms of a Revolution together with Andrei Ujica. Ujica, who was born in Timisoara in 1951, is a Rumanian writer who has been living in Germany since 1981, where he is a lecturer in literature and media theory. He has good connections to Rumanian friends and colleagues who not only opened up the television archives to the authors but also enabled them to get in contact with cameramen from state film studios and with numerous amateur videographers who had documented the events on the streets of Bucharest, often from the roofs of highrise buildings. "If at the outbreak of the uprising only one camera dared to record," said Farocki, "hundreds were in operation on the following day."
Share Videograms of a Revolution via karagarga or demonoid!
at 11:30 AM
No-Stop City, By Archizoom Associati (2006)
Saturday, April 21, 2007
In 1969, the Archizoom group, while carrying out an experimental work in the field of design, also undertook a research on environment, mass culture and the city, which led to the project No-Stop City. For the first time, a book presents this work which coincides with the zenith of the Italian Radical movement. Gathering all the texts and drawings, this book reveals to us the "Endless City" intertwining architecture with objects and the triumphant consumer society, giving an interpretation where the repetition of a single central element, a building or a group of objects makes up, through a play of mirrors, a catatonic environment, a boundless supermarket, a now reached future to be composed. No-Stop City is a qualityless city in which individual can achieve his own housing conditions as a creative, freed and personal activity. The theoretical project was first published in the review Casabella in 1970, under the title: "City, assembly line of social issues, ideology and theory of the metropolis". As Andrea Branzi puts it, this projects implements "the idea of the fading away of architecture within metropolis". No-Stop City is a critical Utopia, a model of global urbanization where design is the essential conceptual instrument used in the mutation of living patterns and territories. This "endless city" is organized the same way as a factory or a supermarket. It presents an iterative pattern with multiple centres and a neutral, even and unbroken. No-Stop City offers itself as a kind of car park fitted out with inhabitable furniture whose use can be adapted to the circumstances. Interior spaces, air-conditioned and artificially lit, allow the organisation of new inhabiting typologies, open and unbroken, intended for new forms of association and community life. "Considering architecture as an intermediate stage of urban organization that has to be overstepped, No-Stop City establishes a direct link between metropolis and furnishing objects: the city becomes a series of beds, tables chairs and cupboards; the domestic and urban furniture fully coincide. To qualitative utopias, we oppose the only possible utopia: that of Quantity" (Andrea Branzi) *Archizoom Associati(Andrea Branzi, Gilberto Corretti, Paolo Deganello, Massimo Morozzi, Dario & Lucia Bartolini), first group of the Italian Radical Architecture movement (1966-1974).
Andrea Branzi
Andrea Branzi (Florence, 1938) is an architect, a graphic designer and a theorist. He has been living and working in Milan since 1073. He is one of the protagonists of radical Italian Architecture who influenced a whole generation of architects from Franck O. Gehry to Daniel Libeskind, from Rem Koolhaas to Bernard Tschumi. He contributed to the creation of the Archizoom group, of which he was a member from 1964 to 1974. His "Radical Notes", published in the review entitled Casabella, participated in the theoretical debate of that period. From 1974 to 1976, Branzi became a member of Global Tools, a counter-school of architecture and design. Associated to studios of experimental industrial design as early as the end of the 60's (first Alchimia, then Memphis), Branzi has always been concerned with design research and promotion, which implies, to him, fresh relationships between men and objects. From 1983 to 1987, he directed the review entitled Modo and, in 1987, he was awarded the Compasso d'Oro for the whole of his career. He is the author of numerous publications such as La casa calda (1982), Animali domestici: lo stile neo-primitivo (1986), Nouvless de la métropole froide (1991) and Il design italiano 1964-1990 (1996), and has also curated many exhibitions. In parallel, Andrea Branzi has continued to conduct projects in architecture and urban planning through the concept of "weak urbanization".
Share No-Stop City via demonoid or karagarga(sign up here)!
at 8:35 PM
Harun Farocki - Leben - BRD aka How to Live in the German Federal Republic (1990)
A critical dissection of modern life in Germany. Composed of thirty-two short scenes taken from instructional and training classes (on everything from stripping, to childbirth, to police tactics), Farocki's intention is to reveal Germany as a place where nothing occurs without rehearsal and preparation.
The author assembles a genre picture of the contemporary FRG with shots of scenes where life is rehearsed, ability/durability is tested. Wherever one looks, people appear as actors playing themselves; they take on roles. A play in the theater of life made up of training courses, fitness tests for things and people. Be it in birth preparation classes for expectant parents or in practice runs for sales talks, on the military training ground or during role-plays for educational purposes. Everywhere the incessant effort to be prepared for the emergency of "reality" can be felt. How To Live In The FRG assembles out of a wealth of details a picture of a society in which childbearing and dying, crying and taking care of people, crossing streets and killing are taught and learned in state or private institutions, indeed have to be learned. The real mechanical ballet is not danced by machines but by people, who move to a music that feeds on bombastic phrases from the realms of social work, bureaucracy and therapy. All together, the collected scenes appear to support the view that a mentality of insurance and providing for the future prevails in the FRG, a country in which happiness as well as misery are supposed to be disciplined by means of social techniques and freed from any measure of unpredictability. And yet How To Live In The FRG goes beyond such an interpretation. The participants in the games, tests, and therapy sessions are not degraded into pieces of evidence for some theory or other. They retain, to varying degrees, something of their dignity. This is a result of Farocki's working method:he has edited the scenes in such a way that even the most nonsensical occurrences as it were explain themselves. (Dietrich Leder, broadcast on February 23, 1990)
Thanks to the original uploader at karagarga! Share this via demonoid!
at 1:48 PM
Harun Farocki - Wie man sieht AKA As You See (1986)
In As You See, Farocki searches for those instances and facts in the history of technology that have been overlooked or ignored, also exploring the ambivalent relationship between technologies developed for civil use and those designed for military purposes.
Thus the film for instance describes how in the 1970's workers at the British arms factory Lucas Aerospace attempted to develop socially useful products to replace the company's military output.
Rather than following a linear argument, this essay-film juxtaposes disparate images and weaves them into a mosaic-like structure which makes it possible for the viewers to make their own connections between the different images as well as between the images and the commentary.
My film As You See is an action-filled feature film. It reflects upon girls in porn magazines to whom names are ascribed and about the nameless dead in mass graves, upon machines that are so ugly that coverings have to be used to protect the workers' eyes, upon engines that are too beautiful to be hidden under the hoods of cars, upon labor techniques that either cling to the notion of the hand and the brain working together or want to do away with it.
Harun Farocki
Thanks to original uploader at karagarga! Share this via demonoid!
at 12:55 PM
Harun Farocki - Stilleben AKA Still Life (1997) (2/8)
Thursday, April 19, 2007
According to Harun Farocki, today's photographers working in advertising are, in a way, continuing the tradition of 17th century Flemish painters in that they depict objects from everyday life - the "still life". The filmmaker illustrates this intriguing hypothesis with three documentary sequences which show the photographers at work creating a contemporary "still life": a cheese-board, beer glasses and an expensive watch.
This remarkable film by Harun Farocki is a powerful essay and commentary on contemporary life. It compares the still-lifes of the Dutch painters with the still-lifes of today: Photographs for advertisements for cheese, beer and watches. Farocki's film is about objects because, according to the director, "Gods and heroes are no longer imaginable." Using behind-the-scenes glimpses of modern advertising offices, where employees toil at the proper placement of objects for maximum sales effect, Farocki presents a vision of our reality in which objects bear witness to their producers. In these objects is a new image of man. With English commentary.
Share Still Life via demonoid or visit this link to become a member of karagarga, where i initially got this. If you want a demonoid invite, post here.
at 7:02 AM
Harun Farocki - I Thought I Was Seeing Convicts (2000)
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
This is the first out of eight work's by Harun Farocki which i will post in the near future.
Images from the maximum- security prison in Corcoran, California. A surveillance camera shows a pie-shaped segment of the concrete yard where the prisoners, dressed in shorts and mostly shirtless, are allowed to spend half an hour a day. When one convict attacks another, those not involved lay flat on the ground, arms over their heads.They know that when a fight breaks out, the guard calls out a warning and then fires rubber bullets. If the fight continues, the guard shoots real bullets. The pictures are silent, the trail of gun smoke drifts across the picture. The camera and the gun are right next to each other. This video also emphasizes the social relationship between the one who fires and the one who films, between the one with force and the one who takes shots.
In I Thought I was Seeing Convicts, his most recent film, Farocki uses shots of security cameras of one of the maximum security prisons in America. We see how the camera suddenly zooms in on a fight between two prisoners. The guarding warns the prisoners through speakers, and then fires rubber bullets. A little later they fire live ammunition. By omitting the sound of this fragment and by placing the camera next to the rifleman Farocki emphasises the social relationship between the one who fires and the one who films; between the one with force and the one who take shots. Because of this the images get a very oppressive and critical character.
Share I Thought I Was Seeing Convicts from 2000 via demonoid(if you need an invite, please post a comment here).
at 9:28 AM
Johan Grimonprez - Dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y (1998)
DIAL H-I-S-T-O-R-Y, the acclaimed hijacking documentary that eerily foreshadowed 9-11. We meet the romantic skyjackers who fought their revolutions and won airtime on the passenger planes of the 1960's and 1970Õs. By the 1990's, such characters were apparently no more, replaced on our TV screens by stories of anonymous bombs in suitcases. Director Johan Grimonprez investigates the politics behind this change, at the same time unwrapping our own complicity in the urge for ultimate disaster. Playing on Don DeLillo's riff in his novel Mao II: "what terrorists gain, novelists lose" and "home is a failed idea", he blends archival footage of hijackings with surreal and banal themes, including fast food, pet statistics, disco, and his quirky home movies. David Shea composed the superb soundtrack to this free fall through history, best described in the words of one hijacked Pepsi executive as "running the gamut of many emotions, from surprise to shock to fear, to joy, to laughter, and then again, fear."
«Dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y» is a video film structured in two fifty-minute parts, presented in the form of an installation The guiding visual thread of the piece is the almost exhaustive chronology of airplane highjackings in the world. The soundtrack is constituted of a fictive narrative inspired by two Don DeLillo novels—«White Noise» and «Mao II»—which, for Grimonprez, «highlight the value of the spectacular in our catastrophe culture.» (...) «Dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y» blends photographic, electronic, and digital images, interspersing reportage shots, clips from science fiction films, found footage, and reconstituted scenes filmed by the artist. The work denounces the media spectacle and seeks to detect the impact of images on our feelings, our knowledge, our memory.
Questions of Hans Ulrich Obrist to JOHAN GRIMONPREZ via e-mail
Hans-Ulrich Obrist:
A question about digital television: so far, digital channels are being watched by very few people. Does this non-Audimat situation create a laboratory, an openness for experiments?
To finally go beyond programme television whose "homogeneity ... is intrinsically hostile to art" (Alexander Kluge).
Johan Grimonprez:
By way of introduction: "MTV SMACKED UP ONLINE: IF VIDEO KILLED THE RADIO STAR, WHAT WILL INTERNET DO TO MTV?" Playlist lets you be the veejay; select your faves and they'll be played one after another! Here's where to get the groove:
Hans-Ulrich Obrist:
Couldn't homogeneity possibly trigger a creative context to read mainstream imagery in deviant ways, to read against the grain?
Johan Grimonprez:
Homogeneity as a vocabulary actually did provide a huge source of inspiration to explore certain themes in "dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y".
Hans-Ulrich Obrist:
How do you struggle as an artist or filmmaker to position yourself vis-a-vis mainstream media ?
Johan Grimonprez:
Art and mainstream media seem to remain mad twin sisters, always argueing. Hence the rivalry between a novelist and a terrorist staged as a metaphor in "dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y". In this plot it's the terrorist who's at the winning hand, since he's able to play the media. The narrative is taken from DeLillo's book Mao II, which contends that the novelist's role within society has been replaced by that of bomb makers and gunmen. "What terrorists gain, novelists lose!", says the book. The end of the film though alludes to the fact that media nowadays might even be outplaying the terrorist.
With 600 channels soon provided on New York cable, might the overall homegeneity not desire the other part: the urge for an extreme diversity, a kind-of-supermarket-idea with specialized departments, evidently to push the viewers' quota. The recent corporate merger of ATT-telephone, Media One and Microsoft might very well give new meaning to the act of zapping. Impossible to surf every channel in a nitetime. Destined to keep the finger on the push-button-program of the remote, we will rather plug in the computer-browser, let the search function pop up our favorite clips from the scifi-channel or the history-channel. We could also let a random-veejay-option simply perform the zapping for us, click for: TELEVISION ON MUTE and tune the stereo to some inflight groove.
Hans-Ulrich Obrist:
Homegeneity of mainstream imagery doesn't necessarily have to dictate a homogenous perception of that imagery?
Johan Grimonprez:
Video-viewing rituals amongst the Warlpiri community at Yuendumu (Central Australia) for example seem to sustain cultural invention. Decodings of Jacky Cheng movies or australian TV-soaps like "Neighbours" would be interpreted along kinship obligations and different story-lines proper to Warlpiri narrative. (see Eric Michaels, Hollywood Iconography: A Warlpiri Reading, 1987).
Hans-Ulrich Obrist:
Similarly the gossip culture of catholic mothers in Northern Ireland would claim Joan Collins from the feuilleton "Dynasty" as an emancipatory icon: wasn't Joan rich enough to act independently and trash all those men?
Johan Grimonprez:
Translation of global culture across geographical (and political) boundaries can be read in most contradictory ways: commercials were the most powerful messages of the West, remarked East German writer Heiner Mller.
Hans-Ulrich Obrist:
The television viewer is maybe not a passive consumer: isn't there always a sense of appropriation, creating one's own terms to read mainstream imagery with a certain iconoclastic pleasure?
Johan Grimonprez:
It became the point of departure to set up a mobile video library: "Beware! In playing the phantom, you become one", a project made in collaboration with film critic Herman Asselberghs, and that has been travelling since its intitiation in 1994.
Hans-Ulrich Obrist:
"Beware! In Playing the phantom, you become one" is your mobile video library and archive, it includes films, documentary films, commercials soaps and sitcoms. The programme changed from Kassel to Paris where it was shown after documenta X. How do you related global issues of a travelling archive with local adaptions and local necessities.
Johan Grimonprez:
It is interesting that the programme in Paris was different, it is no longer possible to send homogenous exhibitons on tours and impose them to places but the terms have every time to be (re)negotiated.
Hans-Ulrich Obrist:
How do you integrate participatory elements into your films and other works in general?
Johan Grimonprez:
McLuhan speaks of hot and cold media, cold media being participatory media with few details, like paper, while hot media offer little possibility for participation, for example television. In this context the question of black and white footage is very interesting. The fact that in the middle of color there appear black and white moments causes a disturbance. In an interview I recently made with Alexander Kluge he said that he tried to make films which are also "the ideology of zapping which can be an extreme form of poetry, going much further than collage."
Hans-Ulrich Obrist:
Could you tell me about this last point, about how zapping transcends collage, where does it lead?
Johan Grimonprez:
The participatory elements would be sometimes as simple as a cup of coffee. We would never install our video library without having the cookies, the smell of coffee and the remote control. These elements already induced a platform of conviviality, an atmosphere for chatting. You were invited to grab a cup of hot coffee and pick up the remote to zap through your own selection of videotapes, in a way become your own curator, select your own film programme from a stack of tapes that ranged from twisted commercials, underground documentaries and alternative MTV to mainstream stuff spinned off from Hollywood and CNN. It would imitate a bit the domestic banality of everybody's home video library, and the visitors were also invited to include their own home-grown camcorder tapes: their honeymoon horrors, UFO-testimonies, their top ten of the Oprah Winfreh Show.
The library alluded to the fact that the very act of watching television contains already a participatory nature in itself, the way we receive, contextualize and recontextualize images. It's exactly what we do with the zapping tool (say: "zaptitude"). Zapping buys into the supermarket ideology, but at the same time it can embody a critical distance as well. It stems in fact from video-deck terminology: zapping, i. e. fast forwarding the videotape past the commercial. Commercial break = zapping time.
No need to zap though, the poetry is right there on CNN. CNN has totally surpassed the way Eisenstein and Vertov envisioned montage as a revolutionary tool. Similarly in how the avantgarde filmmakers of the sixties and seventies have become displaced by MTV's nature to swallow every different sort of novel style. The arrival of MTV on Moscovite TV in Russia was even trumpetted in the Russian press as the biggest event since the 1917 October revolution! Vertov reconsidered through the eyes of MTV. Making a collage of color and black and white footage could easily be reduced as merely an esthetic choice. A zapping mode would splice blood and ketchup, like CNN: images of war cut with strawberry ice cream. It would rather point at an epistomological shift in how a "zaptitude" has transformed the way we look at reality. A jumpy fast forward mode has replaced our conventional models of perception and experience. Sometimes I don't even know anymore if we're still in the middle of the commercial break or whether the film has already started. Soon we'll mistake reality for a commercial break.
Hans-Ulrich Obrist:
The taboo of visible death is usually kept from public sphere into private realm. "dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y" evokes Holbein's sarcophagus painting where the viewer is both inside and outside, the active and passive view coincide. Allegorical death and death as a dumb fact. We are inside and outside, there is the obsession with death in "dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y" (You elsewhere described TV's complicity with death as "the desire we have for the ultimate disaster is one aspect of our relationship with death"). It reminds of what Georges Didi Huberman wrote about Sarcophage: "Ce que je vois, ce que je regarde." In your text "Kobarweng or where is your helicopter" you write: "The observer observed."
Johan Grimonprez:
Virilio remarked once that television turned the world into an accident, and that with the advent of virtual reality the whole of reality will be accidented. Each technology invents its own catastrophe, and with it a different relationship to death. The boat invented the sinking of the boat, the airplane invented the crash of the airplane, just as television has reinvented the way we perceive reality and the way we relate to catastrophe, history and death.
TV has turned our notions of private and public inside out, but more importantly the representational modes for portraying actuality and imagination have become intertwined: CNN borrows from Hollywood and vice versa. The everyday talk show has zapped the family away from the coach right on TV and in the opposite direction catastrophe culture invades our living room. The territory of the home overlaps with the space of TV in a much more profound and psychological way than we are possibly aware. In that respect the gap between spectator and history has been narrowed totally. "dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y" ends also with a scene of a hijacked, crashing plane accidently framed on camcorder by honeymooners. They're immediately invited to host Larry King's talk show on CNN to tell how they were able to shoot the footage. The dynamics of abstract capitalism had already turned the revolutionary hijacker into an anonymous suitcase bomb, push-button history now turns the spectator into historian. The spectator has become the hero and political issues are simply reduced to explanations of how to operate a camcorder. Mellencamp (Patricia Mellencamp, High Anxiety, 1990) calls it the shift from catastrophe to comedy: "We can't change the world, but we can change our socks," according to a Nike ad: "It's not a shoe, it's a revolution.
Share Dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y from 1998 via demonoid!
at 9:01 AM
Learning Book #001 & #002 by Learningsite
Monday, April 16, 2007
Learning Site pays attention to the local conditions it finds in the place where it chooses to work. In the past years Learning Site has mainly worked with resource materials and economies related to the specific situations where work has been carried out. Economic, environmental, labor, property rights, and many other issues are investigated in tandem to produce a variety of perspectives.
Learning Site takes part of a discussion of how knowledge is distributed and produced.
Learning Site is comprised of Rikke Luther (DK) and Cecilia Wendt (S), co-founders of N55 (download N55 BOOK as PDF), Julio Castro (MEX), co-founder of Tercerunquinto, and Brett Bloom (US), co-founder of Temporary Services. The different backgrounds are the basis for expanding the language they built up through sharing and mixing.
Learning Book #001, [Collecting System]:
[Learning Book #001, Collecting System] is a part of an ongoing discussion of how knowledge is distributed and produced. Unused materials are generated in enormous quanitites every day. In this specific discussion, Learning Site is curious about how unused materials are put to use in the local situations they chose to work in. These uses call attention to the factors that Learning Site learns from in order to initiate projects. Economis, environmental conditions, labor, property rights and many other issues are investigated in tandem to produce a variety of perspectives and possible courses of action.
This book shows four projects by Learning Site and the numerous people who worked with them: a house built of caedboard the construction which was learned from the shells of sea urchins, a wearable Walking Ciy, and two houses made of plastic bottles and other material gathered through [Collecting System].
Learning Book #002, [Connecting Systems]:
[Learning Book #002] focuses upon the [Underground Mushroom Gardens] in general and [Underground Mushroom Gardens] during the Singapore Biennale 2006, that took place at the PCF school, Indusroad #79.
[Learning Book #002] is part of an ongoing discussion how knowledge is distributed and produced by paying attention to how systems can be connected with other systems and how these systems could be redefined, added to, expanded and plugged into other systems etcetera. The main systems that are involved and discussed are the regulations to use of land, knowledge systems, food production and trade.
The book includes descriptions of the model [Underground Mushroom Garden], related activity, and three Learning Posters; [Connection Systems, #002] and [Underground Mushroom Gardens, #004A / #004B].
Share these two books via demonoid or go to learningsite and download them!
Related post: Trashing the Neoliberal City: Autonomous Cultural Practices in Chicago from 2000-2005.
at 6:02 PM
